The impact of AI errors in a human-in-the-loop process
dc.contributor.author | Agudo Díaz, Ujué | |
dc.contributor.author | Liberal, Karlos G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Arrese, Miren | |
dc.contributor.author | Matute, Helena | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-14T08:30:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-14T08:30:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-01-07 | |
dc.date.updated | 2025-05-14T08:30:45Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Automated decision-making is becoming increasingly common in the public sector. As a result, political institutions recommend the presence of humans in these decision-making processes as a safeguard against potentially erroneous or biased algorithmic decisions. However, the scientific literature on human-in-the-loop performance is not conclusive about the benefits and risks of such human presence, nor does it clarify which aspects of this human–computer interaction may influence the final decision. In two experiments, we simulate an automated decision-making process in which participants judge multiple defendants in relation to various crimes, and we manipulate the time in which participants receive support from a supposed automated system with Artificial Intelligence (before or after they make their judgments). Our results show that human judgment is affected when participants receive incorrect algorithmic support, particularly when they receive it before providing their own judgment, resulting in reduced accuracy. The data and materials for these experiments are freely available at the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/b6p4z/ Experiment 2 was preregistered | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | Support for this research was provided by Grant PID2021-126320NB-I00 funded by the Spanish Government MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF A way of making Europe, as well as by Grant IT1696-22 from the Basque Government, both awarded to HM | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Agudo, U., Liberal, K. G., Arrese, M., & Matute, H. (2024). The impact of AI errors in a human-in-the-loop process. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S41235-023-00529-3 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/S41235-023-00529-3 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2365-7464 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/2746 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH | |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2023 | |
dc.subject.other | AI | |
dc.subject.other | Artificial intelligence | |
dc.subject.other | Automation bias | |
dc.subject.other | Compliance | |
dc.subject.other | Decision-making | |
dc.subject.other | Human-in-the-loop | |
dc.subject.other | Human–computer interaction | |
dc.title | The impact of AI errors in a human-in-the-loop process | en |
dc.type | journal article | |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | |
oaire.citation.issue | 1 | |
oaire.citation.title | Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications | |
oaire.citation.volume | 9 | |
oaire.licenseCondition | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
oaire.version | VoR |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- agudo_impact_2024.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 1.85 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format