Reliability of an interpretation bias task of ambiguous faces and its relationship with social anxiety, depression, and looming maladaptive style

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Fidalgo, Ángel
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Sven C.
dc.contributor.authorCalvete Zumalde, Esther
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-26T11:04:15Z
dc.date.available2025-05-26T11:04:15Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.date.updated2025-05-26T11:04:15Z
dc.description.abstractSocial anxiety (SA) and depression have been associated with negative interpretation biases of social stimuli. Studies often assess these biases with ambiguous faces, as people with SA and depression tend to interpret such faces negatively. However, the test–retest reliability of this type of task is unknown. Our objectives were to develop a new interpretation bias task with ambiguous faces and analyse its properties in terms of test–retest reliability and in relation to SA, depression, and looming maladaptive style (LMS). Eight hundred sixty-four participants completed a task in which they had to interpret morphed faces as negative or positive on a continuum between happy and angry facial expressions. In addition, they filled out scales on SA, depressive symptoms, and LMS. Eighty-four participants completed the task again after 1–2 months. The test–retest reliability was moderate (r =.57–.69). The data revealed a significant tendency to interpret faces as negative for people with higher SA and depressive symptoms and with higher LMS. Longer response times to interpret the happy faces were positively associated with a higher level of depressive symptoms. The reliability of the present task was moderate. The results highlight associations between the bias interpretation task and SA, depression, and LMS.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by a grant from Basque Government (PRE-2019-1-0034) to the first author and a grant from the Basque Government to the research team (IT1532-22)en
dc.identifier.citationPrieto-Fidalgo, Á., Mueller, S. C., & Calvete, E. (2023). Reliability of an interpretation bias task of ambiguous faces and its relationship with social anxiety, depression, and looming maladaptive style. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 16(1), 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41811-022-00154-W
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/S41811-022-00154-W
dc.identifier.eissn1937-1217
dc.identifier.issn1937-1209
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/2833
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022
dc.subject.otherDepression
dc.subject.otherLooming maladaptive style
dc.subject.otherNegative interpretation biases
dc.subject.otherSocial anxiety
dc.titleReliability of an interpretation bias task of ambiguous faces and its relationship with social anxiety, depression, and looming maladaptive styleen
dc.typejournal article
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
oaire.citation.endPage102
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage81
oaire.citation.titleInternational Journal of Cognitive Therapy
oaire.citation.volume16
oaire.licenseConditionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oaire.versionVoR
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
prieto_reliabity_2023.pdf
Tamaño:
939.69 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos