Examinando por Autor "Villanueva Ruiz, Iker"
Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Effectiveness of neural mobilisation for the treatment of nerve-related cervicobrachial pain: a systematic review with subgroup meta-analysis(Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2024-03) Lascurain-Aguirrebeña, Ion; Dominguez, Laura; Villanueva Ruiz, Iker; Ballesteros, Javier; Rueda-Etxeberria, Mikel; Rueda, José Ramón; Casado Zumeta, Xabat; Araolaza Arrieta, Maialen; Arbillaga Etxarri, Ane; Tampin, BrigitteNeural mobilisations (NM) have been advocated for the treatment of nerve-related cervicobrachial pain; however, it is unclear what types of patients with nerve-related cervicobrachial pain (if any) may benefit. Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, PeDro, Cinahl, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until December 2022. Randomised controlled trials were included if they assessed the effectiveness of NM in nerve-related cervicobrachial pain, and outcome measures were pain intensity and/or disability. Studies were classified according to their inclusion/exclusion criteria as radiculopathy, Wainner cluster, Hall, and Elvey cluster or other. Meta-analyses with subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Rob2 tool. Twenty-seven studies were included. For pain and disability reduction, NM was found to be more effective than no treatment (pooled pain mean difference [MD] = -2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -3.81 to -1.81; pooled disability standardized mean difference = -1.55, 95% CI = -2.72 to -0.37), increased the effectiveness of standard physiotherapy as an adjuvant when compared with standard physiotherapy alone (pooled pain MD = -1.44, 95% CI = -1.98 to -0.89; pooled disability MD = -11.07, 95% CI = -16.38 to -5.75) but was no more effective than cervical traction (pooled pain MD = -0.33, 95% CI = -1.35 to 0.68; pooled disability MD = -10.09, 95% CI = -21.89 to 1.81). For disability reduction, NM was found to be more effective than exercise (pooled MD = -18.27, 95% CI = -20.29 to -17.44). In most comparisons, there were significant differences in the effectiveness of NM between the subgroups. Neural mobilisations was consistently more effective than all alternative interventions (no treatment, traction, exercise, and standard physiotherapy alone) in 13 studies classified as Wainner cluster. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022376087.Ítem Manual therapy and neck-specific exercise are equally effective for treating non-specific neck pain but only when exercise adherence is maximised: a randomised controlled trial(Elsevier Ltd, 2025-03-21) Villanueva Ruiz, Iker; Falla, Deborah; Saez, Marc; Araolaza Arrieta, Maialen; Azkue Barrenetxea, Jon Jatsu; Arbillaga Etxarri, Ane; Lersundi Artamendi, Ana; Lascurain-Aguirrebeña, IonObjective: To assess the effectiveness of manual therapy versus a progressive, tailored neck-specific exercise program with high adherence for treating non-specific chronic neck pain (NSNP) and to examine the relationship between exercise adherence and treatment outcome. Design: Single-blind, parallel, randomized clinical trial with two treatment arms, adhering to CONSORT guidelines. Methods: 65 NSNP participants were randomly allocated to manual therapy or exercise. They received four treatment sessions of either manual therapy or neck-specific exercise, once a week for four weeks. Outcomes measured at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and 12 weeks post-treatment included pain intensity, disability, patient-perceived improvement, quality of life, kinesiophobia and the craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) performance. In addition to evaluating each individual outcome, patients were categorized into either responders or non-responders according to pain intensity, disability and patient-perceived improvement. Exercise adherence was recorded. Results: There were no differences between groups in individual outcomes. Treatment outcome in the exercise group was associated with exercise adherence. Patients receiving manual therapy were more likely to be classified as responders than those receiving exercise at all measured time points (odds ratio, 2 weeks: 0.14; 95 % CI: 0.02–0.79; treatment completion: 0.31; 95 % CI: 0.12–0.82; 12 weeks after treatment completion: 0.19; 95 % CI: 0.05–0.65), however these differences were no longer present when only patients whose exercise adherence was ≥95 % were analysed. Exercise was more effective than manual therapy in improving CCFT performance but only if patients with ≥95 % adherence were considered. Conclusion: A four-week intervention of manual therapy was more effective than exercise, however when exercise adherence was ≥95 %, the interventions were equally effective. Manual therapy may only be superior to specific-exercise when high exercise adherence cannot be assured.Ítem El undergraduate research como metodología facilitadora de la práctica basada en la evidencia(Síntesis, 2023) Araolaza Arrieta, Maialen; Sancho Amundarain, Igor; Villanueva Ruiz, Iker; Ibarzabal Alberdi, Iñigo; Arbillaga Etxarri, AneÍtem Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial(BioMed Central Ltd, 2023-12) Sancho Amundarain, Igor; Araolaza Arrieta, Maialen; Villanueva Ruiz, Iker; Arbillaga Etxarri, AneBackground: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the gold standard approach in physiotherapy, and it is essential that students are aware that it is the appropriate way to provide the patient with the best possible treatment. Undergraduate research (UR) can positively influence learning outcomes and research competencies related to EBP compared to traditional methods of higher education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing a research-based activity (i.e., active participation in a randomised controlled trial [RCT]) in the UR programme on the learning and acquisition of research methodology-related competencies by first-year physiotherapy students. Methods: Students in the first academic year of the Bachelor´s Degree in Physiotherapy of University of Deusto (Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain) who were enrolled in the subject ‘Introduction to Research Methodology’ were invited to take part in a real RCT which consisted of three groups: intervention, placebo, and control group. While the RCT was carried out, researchers and/or participants roles were combined among students during the semester. At the end, a questionnaire that included open and closed questions was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the UR strategies used in students´ acquisition of theoretical knowledge, research competencies, self-efficacy of RCT skills and procedures. Lecturers also completed the questionnaire to evaluate their experience. Results: From the 114 students enrolled in the subject, 102 participated in the RCT and 110 answered the final questionnaire. Regarding the development of research competencies, UR had a positive or very positive impact on critical thinking (67% and 18%, respectively) and in the assessment of methodological quality (66% and 23%, respectively). Furthermore, most students reported that the implementation of the RCT facilitated their knowledge of placebo, detection of bias, development of critical thinking and a better understanding of methodological issues in research. Lecturers reported an additional burden that was difficult to reconcile with daily duties. Conclusion: The novel UR program provided students with a new opportunity to improve their knowledge of RCT procedures, thus making the learning process more meaningful. Therefore, ways of teaching and learning focused on improving research and inquiry attitudes should be considered and integrated into the health care curriculum, especially in physiotherapy programs, to ensure the transfer of EBP for the provision of the best care. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Registry: ACTRN12622000263796p (14/02/2022).